Murray Sherk
Publishing English - Spring Semester 2019
- A
course for second-year, foreign, PhD students in the USTC
School of Management
- The course
focus is to improve writing of scholarly papers for submission
to top-ranked academic journals.
- Look
at the bottom of this page for PowerPoint lesson files and
other material for this course.
- This
webpage is under development and will be updated as
information becomes available and course details are set.
Refresh this page in your browser to get the
latest information.
Classroom location:
- I have updated and fixed the material for
the lessons below. The files (e.g. PPT) are now up to date
except for Lesson 8.
- Final Exam is Monday, May 6 in our usual
seminar room from 9:00am to 11:00am.
- Starting March 25, the course is taught in Seminar Room 2
(not 3) on the first floor of the Management R&D Building.
- The course lessons are on Monday mornings, 9:00AM to
12:15PM.
- The course will have eight 4-hour lessons and an exam.
- Students should bring a computer, tablet, or other device to
class to use for writing. A computer is best, but at the very
least each student should have access to the Internet.
Each class will run from 9:00AM to 12:15PM, with a couple of
breaks during that period.
Roughly the last 1/3 of each lesson will be workshop-type
activities at the end.
Lessons will be on the following days:
-
March 11: Lesson 1 (Be sure to refresh
the page to get the latest version.)
- Handout: Course
Syllabus (.docx)
- Handout: Argument
Strategies (.docx)
- Workshop Material
- CMapTools is a computer program that helps you make
concept maps.
- The website for CMapTools can be quite slow, so for
convenience, here are the CMapTools installers for
- These versions were downloaded from https://cmap.ihmc.us/cmaptools/cmaptools-download/
- That webpage
says: "The basic IHMC CmapTools software is
free for educational
institutions."
- By the way,
that website has some nice examples and
instructions.
- Lesson
1
PowerPoint file (.pptx) (For reasons I do not know, the
PPT is strange on the website so you need to tell PPT to
"repair" the file before running it.)
- Homework:
- Email to me, before our next class, your Report#1 for
your writing project (80-120 words, see Lesson 1
PowerPoint for full specifications).
- Email me a selfie (photo of you – head/shoulders) for
your attendance card.
- Write a 200-word start-up guide for new grad students
about what the best journals are in your research area and
how to access those journals here at USTC. Use your best
English!
Submit this by email to msherk@ustc.edu.cn before next
class (worth 2%)
- Also, use CMapTools to make a concept map for your
start-up guide and bring the concept map (on paper) to
our next class. (worth 1%)
- Note: Both the concept map and the guide itself should
give specific information, like names of the top
journals.
- Bring a computer to our next class. In class, and
particularly in the last third of each class, a computer
will be very helpful for our activities. At the very
least, you must have a device on which you can access
online information and articles, but ideally you will be
able to type and edit documents in class.
-
March 18: Lesson 2 (Be sure to refresh
the page to get the latest version.)
- Review of Lesson 1
- Analysis of examples of 5-minute and 10-minute writing
from Lesson 1
- Comparison of concept maps done for Lesson 1 homework
- More about Arguments: Introduction to logical fallacies
- What makes a paper good?
- Editor's point of view
- Referee's point of view (Reviewer's view)
- Reader's point of view
- Workshop Material
- Tools of the trade: A tour of Microsoft Word
- Lesson 2
PowerPoint file (.pptx) (For reasons I do not understand,
you need to tell PowerPoint to "repair" this file before
running it.)
- Homework
- Make sure you grasp the main ideas of the SSW article we
looked at in the workshop: www.americanscientist.org/blog/the-long-view/the-science-of-scientific-writing
- Bring to next class, on paper or on your electronic
device, a “model” paper in your research area
- High-quality journal, Native English-speaking authors,
Look for an “Editor’s choice” or famous paper
- A paper you wish YOU had written!
- We will be using this in our next class so each
student needs one.
- Register for free Grammarly (www.Grammarly.com)
and install the Grammarly for Microsoft Office plug-in in
your copy of Microsoft Word.
- Play with Microsoft Word and learn some new techniques.
- As you must do every week, email a 100-word report to
Murray about what you did in your scheduled hour of work
on your course project.
-
March 25: Lesson 3 (Be sure to refresh
the page to get the latest version.)
- What makes a good paper good?
- Principles for Good Writing
- Workshop Material
- Lesson 3
PowerPoint file (.pptx) Please do not view any slide
in this file before we get to that slide in our lesson!
(Peeking at answers means you learn less.)
- Homework
- Read the short article at matt.might.net/articles/successful-phd-students
- Come prepared to discuss this next week.
- You might want to follow some of Dr. Might's links for
interest.
- Run Grammarly on some of your own writing.
- Where is Grammarly correct? Where is Grammarly wrong?
(False positive or missed error)
- Come prepared to show examples to a classmate next
week.
- As you must do every week, email a 100-word report to
Murray about what you did in your scheduled hour of work
on your course project.
-
April 1: Lesson 4
- Prof. Matthew Might’s advice about success: matt.might.net/articles/successful-phd-students
- Write a concept map for your research arc.
- More principles for good writing: Principles
of Good Writing SSW, BCG, & PE
- Workshop:
- Grammarly examples from homework
- Making (intentionally!) and analyzing sentences that are
correct English but have bad style.
- Lesson 4
PowerPoint file (.pptx)
- Homework
- Bring to next class a sample of your own writing in your
research area.
- Must be your writing (may or may not be from your
current course project)
- Do not write something new for this! Choose something
you have already written.
- 1000 words or more in a Word document
- Should be reasonably polished, not a rough draft
- Complete your research arc concept map and either email
it to Murray (if it is electronic) or bring it to next
class (if you do it on paper).
- As you must do every week, email a 100-word report to
Murray about what you did in your scheduled hour of work
on your course project.
-
April 8: Lesson 5
- A method to repair sentences
- Murray's example
- Example for students to fix:
- “Beginning a business in a new area where the local
conditions are not known and where there may be cultural
factors and obscure local legal laws whose understanding
is vital to success in that area is an activity that
involves unacceptably high risk.”
- Principle PE4: Long noun phrases as grammatical subjects
or objects. (Related to BCG3: Avoid long introductory
clauses and phrases.)
- Principle PE5: Pronouns "it", "they", "that", "which"
- Principle PE6: Main verbs “is/are”, “has/have”
- Analysis of model papers and own writing
- One way to
check text (.dox) This electronic version does not
the circle, box, and line that were on the physical
handout given in class.
- Clarifications when there are multiple subjects and
verbs in one sentence.
- For the “S”, circle a single word that is the main
subject (other words may modify/clarify that single
word).
- If there are two subjects for a single verb,
consider them as one double-subject and circle the two
root words. Example: “Most men and some women enjoy
football.” Circle “men” and “women”. S-V distance is
0. Length of subject noun phrase is 5.
- For the “V”, put a box around the word that specifies
the main verb.
- If there are two verbs for the same subject, treat
that as one double-verb and box the root words of
each. Example: “Table 2 compares and contrasts the new
method with previous methods.” Box “compare” and
“contrast”. S-V distance is 0 (counting “Table 2” as
the root subject).
- In some cases, it is better to consider this as two
SV(O)s. Example: “We use panel data from two countries
and compare the results.” Treat this as two SVOs: “We
use data” and “We compare results”. S-V distances are
1 and 7.
- Analysis table
to check text (.docx)
- Lesson 5
PowerPoint file (.pptx)
- Homework:
- Look at your analysis of your 1000-word writing sample.
How are the analysis answers different from those for the
model papers? Do these differences indicate problems with
your writing?
- Write a 250-word analysis
of what differences you see and what you need to beware of
in your own writing.
- Full English sentences (good English!)
- Email this to me before next
class.
- This can be your writing project work and report for
one week
-
April 15: Lesson 6
- Research Proposals (and similar documents)
- Presentation originally by Dr. Wayne Brodland (an
experienced Canadian Civil Engineering professor)
- Student discussion of article: Focus on Literature
Review and References
- Reference-Keeping Systems
- Demo of EndNote & an important “fix”
- Which system? EndNote, Mendeley, Zotero …
- Try one out!
- More Principles for Good Writing
- Lesson 6
PowerPoint file (.pptx)
- Homework:
- 250-word specification of what should be in the final
section of a written paper, often labeled the "Conclusion"
or "Discussion and Conclusions".
- Good English
- Email to Murray before next class.
-
April 22: Lesson 7
- PE7: Avoid cultural bias problems. Remember your
international audience.
- Personal pronouns (we, our, us) in academic writing
- British English style vs. American English style
- PE8 and BCG7: Proofreading and sentence structure
- Information points: Simple SV(O)s.
- Checking for logic: Clear focus? Sensible idea? Idea
interesting - not too obvious? Wording is not wimpy?
Logical connection of ideas? Reasoning is not circular?
- Combining SV(O)s into longer sentences to get more
elegant writing. ("SVO. SVO. SVO. SVO..." is boring.)
- Modifiers
- Bad: Misplaced modifiers
- Good: Resumptive modifiers (webpage1),
Summative modifiers (webpage2)
- PE9 and PE10: Transitions and conjunctions
- Workshop: Text analysis and correction of part of a
research paper introduction
- Faulty
text with some problems underlined (.docx) - Please
do not look at this handout until instructed to do so.
- Murray's
corrected version (.docx) - Please do not look at
this handout until instructed to do so.
- You may disagree with me about some things I did or
did not change; that's fine. There is not just one way
to make this text better. I added some comments about
higher-level weaknesses: cultural bias ("reform and
opening"), vague/undefined term ("disturbance"), and
logic (last sentence was not an "example" of an
implication of EKC).
- Lesson 7
PowerPoint file (.pptx)
- Homework:
- Write a 10-item checklist specifically for your writing.
- These should reflect the 10 most common and most
important weaknesses in your writing!
- Consider this course’s Principles
for Good Writing (on website) but some of your 10
items may not be listed there.
- Express each item as 10-30 words (1-2 sentences) and be
specific.
- Use imperative sentences (commands to yourself) such
as “Look for… and change them to…”.
- Email this checklist to Murray before the exam.
- You may do this homework as one week’s writing project
work, but you still need to write the usual 100-word
report about what you did in your project writing time.
The report is different from the checklist!
-
April 29: Lesson 8
- More Principles of Good Writing
- PE11: Passive voice and active voice
- PE12: Beware of multiple negatives. Double negatives may
be OK. Using three or more negatives in one phrase/idea is
a bad idea.
- "The problem is not unknown." This sentence is OK. It
means the problem is neither common nor unknown, but is
rare compared to most other problems.
- "Not using this method will never fail
to avoid giving an unsatisfactory
answer." 5 negatives... so is the method good or bad?
- PE13: When using a comparison word (e.g. larger, more),
make sure that what is it being compared to is clear
- "The new method is faster." Faster than what?
Sometimes the "what" is implied and obvious, but often
it is not as clear as the author thinks.
- PE14: Avoid informal and colloquial terms. Avoid
contractions. Beware of pretentious terms and using
"fancy" vocabulary.
- Bad: "a lot of", "lots", "nowadays", "lab", ...
- Bad: "isn't", "can't", "don't", "we'll", "it's" (= "it
is") ...
- Good: Apostrophe to indicate possession is fine:
"This study's importance...", "China's minority groups
have...", ...
- Questionable: "heretofore", "hereafter"
- PE15: Always check the final version with a computer
spelling/grammar checker such as Grammarly.
- Remember: Word's spelling/grammar checker may be
turned off for certain text! Grammarly will check all
text, ignoring those flagged with Word's "Do not check
spelling or grammar" flag.
- Review of all Principles
for Good Writing (.docx)
- A handout of these principles will be given in this
class. (You probably should bring this to the final exam,
but it's your choice.)
- SSW1-7: Pay particular attention to the boldface items.
- BCG1-8: Pay particular attention to the boldface items.
- PE1-15: All of these are important for you and for the
exam.
- Exam questions could relate to any of these 30
principles, as well as to the spelling, grammar,
punctuation, spacing, capitalization, verb forms,
singular/plural agreement, and other issues important to
high-quality writing for an academic journal.
- Final Exam from Spring 2017
- Spring 2019 exam compared to 2017 exam
- No questions or text passages are the same.
- Some problems and issues in the text passages may be
the same.
- The exam has the same number of questions in the same
categories.
- The exam starts at 9:00am. Please arrive at our
classroom at least 10 minutes early (8:50am).
- I hope that most of you will be done in 90 minutes, but
you are allowed to take a full two hours to finish the
exam.
- Lesson 8
PowerPoint file (.pptx)
- Homework:
- None, but you may submit another weekly writing project
work report if you need to make up for missing one of the
seven. I require only 7 reports from you (not 8, as I
originally told you).
Final Exam: Monday, May 6, 9:00-11:00 in our
usual seminar room.
Section 1 [30 marks] Fix or improve these text passages
Each of the following passages has multiple weaknesses and/or
errors that make it poor English. Based on what you understand the
sentence to mean, rewrite the text in perfect, stylish English.
You should use wording that expresses the worthwhile ideas of the
text accurately and concisely. Your rewritten text may be more
than one sentence.
You do not have to explain what is wrong with the passage; just
fix it!
A few minutes after the exam begins, these sentences will be
on the course website so you can electronically copy the originals
from there if you want to avoid some typing.
1.1 [10 marks] Hint: Use clauses and at least
one modifier (resumptive, summative, or free).
John is a man. John is tall. John is British. John is a manager at
a factory. The factory belongs to ABC Incorporated. John’s factory
manufactures toys. Those toys are expensive.
1.2 [10 marks]
Internet-based communication innovations that force international
communication to connect some people, in several different
countries with those in some other international countries using a
lot of internet communication is one of a number of ways to
increase, expand, and augment profit.
1.3 [10 marks]
The computers and the smartphone have great and strong in-fluences
on market today. And it is a continuing development. So anybody
who ignores it is an idiot that will crash and burn. But wise
managers make investigations of influences like this to keep in
competition with competitors.
Section 2 [30 marks] Explain why these text passages need
improvement
Each of the following passages has weaknesses and/or errors
that make it poor English. Describe each weakness and error
in the passage. You must describe the problems in words and make
sure your wording convinces me you know what each problem is.
• Use point form, but make sure that your
meaning is clear. E.g. “circular argument”, “main verb too far
from main subject”, “weasel word: quite”
• You must name or describe the problem but for
clarity, you may also link your description to one of the
“Principles for Good Writing” (e.g. SSW7, BCG6, PE13).
You do not have to fix the passage; just say what is wrong with
it. Each passage has more than one weakness or error. List 3 to
5 problems for each passage.
2.1 [10 marks]
Nowadays, lots of employees take his Holidays not in the summer
which means and has the following effect hereafter: during the
summer there are plenty of Workers to keep the factory going and
operating as usual in those summer months. Unlike in earlier
decades before now.
2.2 [10 marks]
Not believing that no company that never breaks its agreements is
rarely going to work, Jill will have been establishing it as a
principle of her new firm years ago and, can’t turn over a new
leaf, now. But, to make a long story short, I believe it is
possible that maybe a newer company or firm can not do any gooder.
2.3 [10 marks]
New regulatory rules from our government that, since last year,
have caused some domestic firms, among others, to spend more, or
at least a little bit more, in some cases, on some safety
meazures, don’t make it easy, particularly for new firms, to
expand.
- - - - - - - -
This is the end of this webpage.